2012년 2월 20일 월요일

Photography and Society

Photography and Society


Introduction

The works of Alexander Rodchenko, Peter Kennard and John Heartfield are quite different from each other. While all three artist attempt to portray political messages, they all do so in their own unique ways. Their photographs attempt to convey messages of the realities of political changes during their times and the effects that arise from these changes. With the works of Rodchenko, Kennard and Heartfield one would assume that political activism is central to their portrayed images. One should also take note of the techniques used by the artists, which can also create insight into the photographers’ minds.

Similarities

The main and possibly the most apparent similarity between all three artists is the main style they used – photomontage. Photomontage is the process of making one photograph with cutting and pasting a number of other photographs together. All of these artists took this method due to the impact it creates; as Peter Kennard saw it at the time, photomontage had the power to show the causes rather than the results.




Peter Kennard (Broken Missile)




Alexander Rodchenko




Something that is also prevalent between the photos of all three photographers is the strong focus on the theme of war and capturing the struggles of human rights and peace. All of these artists battle very political topics, most of the photo published were for the purpose of propaganda. Propaganda is a form of communication to influence how a community sees a particular situation. As example is John Heartfields anti-Hilter poster; this poster is meant to emphasize and refer to how much money Hitler is swallowing and receiving from wealthy industrialists, fearing Germany would vote for a communist government.
All three artists do differ from each other, but relate in their works towards some sort of message that they attempted to convey. Through their images, we as a society can illustrate images in our mind of political changes and events during their times.



John Heartfield (Adolf the Superman)




Differences

Although all three of these photographers wanted to capture political issues, their messages were all very different and unique in their own ways. John Heartfield’s focus, in the time when he was most proactive with his photography, was on the anti-Nazi/anti-Hitler movement. John Heartfield went as far as changing his name from Helmut Herzfeld to avoid his service time. When looking at John Heartfield, this German photographer also used the techniques of photomontage, like Kennard, but portrayed a more experimental approach to his art. Heartfield, much like Rodchenko, was interested in the portrayal of politics, however they do differ. Heartfield was devoted to anti-Nazi political activism portrayals (No author, 2012) a. He expressed his views through these images, even in response to his German heritage while he depicted the horrors of World War One in Germany. Heartfield was also notorious for his infamous utilization of quotations in his images, also creating some sort of irony to his images.




John Heartfield (Blood and Iron)




Peter Kennard was a more modern artist, and his art is more relatable to people viewing his art today. His focus was very much on armaments (military weaponry) and poverty, how those two create and cause disparity in our society. Peter Kennard focused mainly on politics, especially of those with British influence. Instead of using personal responses as a form of communication like Rodchenko, Kennard wanted to show the “unrevealed truth” behind the images that he capture, which he found most useful. Using the technique of photomontage, Kennard set his focus on art pertaining to the topics of armaments and poverty, unlike the images of political activism created by Rodchenko. Kennard believed that photography had the power to illustrate the causes of something rather than the results created from something (No author, 2012)b. Kennard also had been exposed to digital technology, which he was against, as we can see in the quote below.

"There is a problem with montage in that you see it everywhere now because of digital technology. There is so much transformed imagery around that people accept constructed images without questioning their meaning. I think my work was losing impact because of that." – Peter Kennard




Peter Kennard (Defended to Death)



Alexander Rodchenko was a Russian artist turned photographer during the Revolution of October 1917, who created images that resembled Avant-Garde type works (The Museum of Modern Art, 1998). The art of Rodchenko attempted to depict the Communist culture following World War One, and created a unique styling in the images portrayed (The Museum of Modern Art, 1998). Rodchenko’s works lead the way of art in Soviet Russia and his abstract work creates images of personal responses to illustrates Russia’s progress during that time frame. His work rejects socially created conventional roles of self-expression and aesthetic predilections, making him somewhat of a political artist (The Museum of Modern Art, 1998). Alexander Rodchenko was an artist of very controversial, by taking a very nihilistic focus to art to a point when many didn’t believe what he produced was art. Rodchenko’s focus was on the society but more so for the production aspect. He designed things for propaganda, posters, book covers, and etc.




Alexander Rodchenko


Did These Photographers Impact Society?


These three photographers all had made a huge impact on the society, both through their art and the meaning that they were conveying to the society. These three artists were able to lead more than thousands of people, but they are not worldwide famous photographer or artists. They all had a vision and were determined to succeed in their life time. Each artist had impacted society in a different but similarly significant way – whether it was Heartfield’s propaganda material in late 1800’s, or Rodchenko’s innovative take on photography. Whether it was good or bad they all made audience feel and change the way they felt about the future. Photography is a very powerful tool, and it can change people lives for decades; as technology improves every day it will continue to provide heartfelt and impactful images to the human mind and therefore placing a strong impact on everyone.


Can Photographers Achieve that Impact on Society?


Photography is used around the world as a powerful visual toll that not only impact society but also creates changes. Photographers through their photographs have an influence in persuading their audience and viewers. Photographers express their views through their lenses, and the message generated can sometimes pursued a whole civilization. Each photographer shapes their own message according to their views about the world. This message as a result can have a massive effect on society simply because reality is exposed. Photography can also influence society to act in certain ways. News papers use photography to emphasize their messages with images. The government use photos to illustrate their scrutiny and to accentuate their accomplishments to pursue citizens to gain more political control. Nonetheless Photographers throughout photography can achieve change. Peter Kennard, John Heartfield and Alexander Rodchenko tried to create change thought their lenses, but with not much success, their work and views still impacts society until today. Peter Kennard, John Heartfield and Alexander Rodchenko were above their fear, and by means of their work were able to impact society at an extraordinary level. Their courage inspired many photographers and followers to be original and confront their fears. Alexander Rodchenko established unprecedented compositional paradigms that until these days translate the idea of modern photographic art. Peter Kennard work has influenced modern photographers, film makers and even some computer programs like Photoshop. Finally, John Heartfield's art has had a considerate effect on modern advertising. The proposal of a photomontage is used on many advertisement printed in magazines today. These photographers created a landmark in the world, and with their messages alive in their photographs we can look at their job and learn from the past how to create a better future
 
.

Group Members
Wonkeun Cho
Jennifer Hsu
Bruno Sacchetti
Michelle Lisi

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
sources

"Alexander Rodchenko - Biography." The Internet Movie Database (IMDb). Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0734447/bio>.

"Alexander Rodchenko: A Man Who Took Life Lying down - Telegraph." Telegraph.co.uk - Telegraph Online, Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph - Telegraph. Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/3671028/Alexander-Rodchenko-A-man-who-took-life-lying-down.html>.

"John Heartfield: Life." Towson University. Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <http://www.towson.edu/heartfield/life/WorldwarOne.html>.

My Blackboard. Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <https://gbc.blackboard.com/webct/urw/tp0.lc5122011/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct>.

(NP).My Blackboard Retrieved from https://gbc.blackboard.com/webct/urw/tp0.lc5122011/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct

“J.Paul Getty Museum”- Alexander Rodchenko: Fine Art, Portraiture Biography Retrieved from http://www.profotos.com/education/referencedesk/masters/masters/alexanderrodchenko/alexanderrodchenko.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda

http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/1998/rodchenko/texts/photojournalism.html

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/davepalmer/cutandpaste/kennard.html

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/davepalmer/cutandpaste/heartfield.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photomontage

http://www.towson.edu/heartfield/art/superman.html

http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A4975&page_number=7&template_id=6&sort_order=1&section_id=T072573

http://jesseturri.com/wordpress/?p=210

2012년 2월 10일 금요일

Edit Submission: Assignment 2 - Photo Manipulation Assignment


Today the quality of photograph has been improved and many editing tools make the photographs more interesting and beautiful. Before I start I want to say that this is my first time to editing the pictures and because of this course I am glad that I am learning new skill to editing some picture.
For this assignment I used the pictures that I took last few month ago during the winter break. First picture was taken by me at my friend’s house during the birthday party and I realized that the view was very awesome in the sunrise setting

                              Before                                                                      After










  
The editing concept that I focused on in this picture was to present it in a sepia primitive Polaroid style that imitated an olden day version of Toronto. There were several steps involved in the process of creating this theme. The step by step process is summarized below. 

Step one: I adjusted the picture by cropping out the modernized building while twisting the angle of the picture to give it an artistic touch for presentation purposes.

Step two: I applied the warm colored setting to give it a softer feel, and then I proceeded to set the mode to sepia as to enhance the historic theme.  

Step three: To allow the picture to come across as an authentic (non-digitalized) one I decided to apply the Polaroid theme.

The next picture I decided to edit and present was taken from my veranda during the night as can be seen; the view is very beautiful during the dark hours as the various lights create a beautiful feel, I personally prefer it to the daytime view. The reason I chose to edit this specific photo is because is because it’s versatility, There are many amazing themes and setting that can be applied to it that brings out many different feelings and moods. I chose the neon theme because it is very suggestive and simplified, many details has been reduced while exaggerating the structures of the building to bring it alive. The colors were automatically reduced in number when the setting was applied this is what gave it its simplified yet exciting feel to it.

    
Before


                                                                  After


The steps used to edit this photo was very simple, below is a step by step walkthrough of the process.

Step one: I adjusted the picture enabling it to looks brighter.

Step two: I applied the neon setting to the picture.

Step three: I changed the pictures color to red. 

I enjoyed using Picasa3; it is an impressive, unique, easy to use program with many modernized and innovative features. I recommend it to anyone interested in modern/digitalized photography. I also learned how to edit pictures to accommodate any theme I envisioned. I will continue to use it moving forward for my own personal development and benefits.